Pin Feed
The honest comparison

Pin Feed vs BugHerd

BugHerd turns feedback into tasks on a kanban board. Pin Feed turns clients into reviewers with one link. Here's how to pick, or how to run both.

Free for 3 projects · 14 days of Pro included · No credit card
Side by side

The short version

Both tools pin feedback on websites. They were built for different people. Here's the honest side by side.

FeaturePin FeedBugHerd
Built forClient review on live sitesBug tracking with a kanban board
Install modelNothing to install, no script, no extensionJS snippet on the site, or a browser extension
Guest accessShare link, name + email onlyNo account, but the snippet or extension comes first
Viewports with separate pinsDesktop 1440, tablet 768, mobile 375Reviewer's own browser size, logged on the task
Kanban task boardNo, pin threads with resolve insteadYes
Auto screenshot on every pinYesYes
Image and PDF proofing with versionsYesYes, clients need the browser extension
IntegrationsSlack (Jira, Linear, Trello coming soon)Jira, Slack, Trello, Asana, and more
Pricing modelFlat: $49/mo, unlimited projectsSeat tiers from $50/mo for 5 members
Free planFree forever, 3 projectsFree trial only

BugHerd plans, pricing, and install details checked at bugherd.com in June 2026. Tell us if something changed and we'll fix it.

Weighing more than two tools? We keep a full, honest list of BugHerd alternatives with the same no-spin treatment.

Different jobs

A bug tracker and a client review tool are not the same thing

The overlap is real (both pin comments on pages), but the workflows underneath point in different directions.

BugHerd: feedback in, tasks out

  • Feedback becomes a task on a kanban board (Backlog, To Do, Doing, Done)
  • Browser, OS, and screen size captured on every report
  • Integrations push tasks into Jira, Trello, Asana, and more
  • Runs via a JS snippet on the site or a browser extension

Pin Feed: clients in, pins out

  • Feedback is a pin with a thread, on the real live page
  • Three viewports, each keeping its own set of pins
  • Guests join with a share link, just a name and email
  • Live sites, images, and PDFs proofed in one place

That split matters most on the receiving end. A developer is happy to see a ticket with browser metadata. A client just wants to point at the thing and say what's wrong, which is the whole idea behind client review in Pin Feed.

The install wedge

Your client's entire setup is clicking a link

BugHerd needs its JavaScript snippet on the site, or a browser extension in the reviewer's browser, before feedback can happen. Fair enough for your own team. It's a harder ask for a client who barely opens attachments. Pin Feed loads the live page through a reverse proxy, so there's nothing to add to your site and nothing for your client to install. They open the share link, type a name and an email, and they're pinning.

  • No script on the site, no extension in their browser
  • Guests can pin, draw with all six tools, comment, and resolve
  • Rotate the share link any time to cut off access instantly
M
Maya2h
Can we tighten the H1 tracking? Feels loose at this size.
S
Sam1h
Done. Pushed to staging, refresh and tell me.
M
Maya5m
Way better. Resolving.
Resolved · 2 minutes ago
Responsive review

Three viewports, each with its own pins

BugHerd logs the reporter's browser and screen size on every task, which is genuinely useful for reproducing bugs. Pin Feed goes further for design review: switch between desktop, tablet, and mobile (1440, 768, and 375) and each viewport keeps its own set of pins. “It looks broken on my phone” arrives already pinned on the mobile view, with a screenshot captured at pin time.

  • Per-viewport pins with unresolved counts on each device
  • Tablet and mobile render inside realistic device frames
  • Reviewers on real phones land on the mobile view automatically
Desktop · 1440
Tablet · 768
Mobile · 375
Who should pick which

An honest sorting hat

No tool wins everything. Here's where each one earns its keep.

Pick BugHerd if

  • Your team runs sprints on a kanban board and wants feedback to arrive as tasks
  • The reviewers are mostly developers and QA, not clients
  • You need Jira, Trello, or Asana wired in today
  • You can put a JS snippet on every site you review

Pick Pin Feed if

  • Your reviewers are clients, and asking them to install anything is a dead end
  • You review responsive work and want phone feedback kept apart from desktop
  • You proof images and PDFs alongside live sites, with versions
  • You want one flat price instead of counting seats

And they coexist just fine: BugHerd for the bug backlog, Pin Feed for the client rounds. If revisions are how you make your money, see how agencies run client reviews with Pin Feed.

0 client accounts needed3 viewports6 drawing tools1 link

Questions, answered

For client review, yes. If your main job is collecting revision feedback from clients on live sites, Pin Feed is built for exactly that: share link in, pinned threads out, nothing installed anywhere. If your main job is dev bug triage on a kanban board, BugHerd is genuinely good at that and we won't pretend otherwise.

Give your clients a link, not homework.

Start free, send one share link, and watch the revision round come back as pins instead of paragraphs.

Start free
Free for 3 projects · 14 days of Pro included · No credit card